Week 6 Assignment 2/20

WP2 was a little easier than WP1 in my experience. There is a lot of information available to the public regarding wildfires and other natural disasters, so it wasn't hard at all to find relevant information. It was easier to write because the format characteristic of online environmental news articles is very short, concise, and straight to the point. I didn't need to add any "fluff" or unnecessary language in order to sound like I new what I was talking about, so putting everything on to paper was simple. It's also easier to write about something that is interesting to you or pertains to your field of study since you already have some knowledge or are somewhat passionate about it. It was also easier than I thought to meet the word count requirement due to the abundance of information and sources.

What I thought made WP2 a little difficult was that I was told I needed to emphasize "research" over general information after my first draft was read. But I felt that I had described in scientific detail all the involved processes I could, so trying to figure out what additional information I should include beyond the research I had done was a little difficult. I ended up just going into even more detail about the processes already discussed, with additional scientific information provided on any cause/effect I could find in my article. Other than, WP2 wasn't too difficult.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2 Assignment

Week 1 Assignment

Week 4 Assignment 2/6